一、任务回应：题目问什么就答什么，别“跑题”
**自问：Task 2 题目出现“Discuss both views and give your own opinion”，我如果只写一边观点，会扣多少分？** **自答：直接掉到 5 分档，因为“addresses only parts of the task”。** **满分做法拆解：** - **精准审题**：划出指令词（discuss / to what extent / why）与限定词（young people / in schools）。 - **结构对称**：双边讨论各占一段，结尾段再明确个人立场，**避免“一边倒”导致回应失衡**。 - **例证具体**：用“Finland 取消学科分科后学生创造力提升”这种**可验证案例**，而非“my friend told me”式道听途说。 ---二、连贯与衔接：逻辑像高铁轨道，段段有“信号灯”
**自问：为什么背了 100 个连接词还是 6 分？** **自答：因为考官看的是“逻辑关系”而非“词汇数量”。** **高分信号系统：** 1. **段内微逻辑**：每段首句给“主题信号”，例如“Another compelling reason lies in …”。 2. **代词回指**：用 this / these / such 指代前文整句，减少重复。 3. **语义承接**：用“Equally significant is …”替代“Second”，**体现思维深度而非机械排序**。 ---三、词汇丰富度：同义替换不是“换词”，而是“换语境”
**自问：把 important 换成 significant 就能提分吗？** **自答：不能，考官要的是**“精准且地道”**的搭配，而非同义词堆砌。** **满分示范：** - **话题词群**：教育类准备 pedagogy / curriculum design / formative assessment，**形成语义场**。 - **动词升级**：用“mitigate”替代“reduce”，“catalyse”替代“cause”，**但须与语境匹配**。 - **固定搭配**：commit a faux pas / shoulder the responsibility / pose a dilemma，**让语言自然流淌**。 ---四、语法多样性：复杂句不是“长难句”，而是“功能句”
**自问：写了 5 行定语从句为何仍 6 分？** **自答：考官统计的是**“句型功能”**而非长度，如条件、倒装、强调、分词结构。** **高分句型库：** - **条件倒装**：Were schools to prioritise creativity, rote learning would diminish. - **分词结构**：Having been exposed to multicultural classrooms, students tend to exhibit greater empathy. - **强调句**：It is through experiential learning that genuine critical thinking emerges. ---五、Task 1 满分：数据图不是“流水账”，而是“故事线”
**自问：小作文要不要写结论？** **自答：线图、柱图、饼图需要**“overview”**，无结论不 7+。** **高分叙事法：** - **抓极值**：The proportion of renewable energy in Sweden peaked at 54% in 2020. - **比趋势**：While Japan saw a marginal decline, Germany experienced a threefold surge. - **用分词**：Starting at merely 5%, the figure rocketed to approximately one third of the total over the given period. ---六、常见失分陷阱：你以为的“亮点”其实是“黑点”
- **模板痕迹**：To embark upon this essay, there is a heated debate... 考官一眼识别，**直接降档**。 - **中式英语**：open the television / the price is so cheap，**属于 collocation 错误**。 - **字数虚胖**：重复题干或废话连篇，**超过 330 词反而暴露语言瑕疵**。 ---七、实战演练：一篇 9 分范文骨架
**题目**：Some people think governments should invest more in public libraries, while others believe the money should be spent on other priorities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. **首段**：Public libraries, once the epicentre of communal knowledge, now face obsolescence in the digital era. While fiscal prudence dictates channeling funds toward ostensibly urgent sectors, I contend that libraries still warrant robust state support. **主体段 1（反方）**：Admittedly, diverting resources to STEM education or healthcare appears compelling. **For instance**, South Korea’s government slashed library budgets by 12% in 2021 to bolster AI research, catalysing a 30% surge in patent applications. **Nevertheless**, such gains risk exacerbating societal inequity, as rural populations remain digitally disenfranchised. **主体段 2（正方）**：Conversely, libraries transcend their traditional custodial role; they metamorphose into innovation hubs. **A case in point** is Helsinki’s Oodi Library, which offers 3-D printing and coding workshops, recording 2.3 million visits in 2022—**a testament to their enduring relevance**. **结尾段**：In essence, libraries are not relics but crucibles of future-ready citizens. Governments neglect them at the peril of widening the chasm between the information elite and the digitally marginalised. ---八、备考时间表：90 天冲刺方案
- **第 1-30 天**：每天精读 1 篇 9 分范文，**拆解逻辑链 + 摘录搭配**。 - **第 31-60 天**：限时写作，Task 2 控制在 35 分钟，**重点训练审题与段落展开**。 - **第 61-90 天**：找专业批改，**针对语法错误建立“个人黑名单”**，反复重写直至零失误。 ---九、考官心理揭秘：他们 2 分钟如何打分
- **第 15 秒**：扫开头段，**看是否直接回应任务**。 - **第 45 秒**：浏览每段首句，**检查逻辑递进**。 - **第 90 秒**：随机挑 3 句，**评估词汇与语法复杂度**。 - **第 120 秒**：核对字数与格式，**决定最终档位**。 ---十、最后提醒：满分不是“完美”，而是“精准”
考官允许少量拼写或标点瑕疵，只要**四项评分细则同时触及 9 分描述**。把每一次练习当成“微型考试”，用上述框架自检，**让提分成为可复制、可量化的工程**。
（图片来源网络，侵删）
版权声明：除非特别标注，否则均为本站原创文章，转载时请以链接形式注明文章出处。
还木有评论哦，快来抢沙发吧~